Post by account_disabled on Jan 1, 2024 3:03:49 GMT -5
Apersonal date within the meaning of this provision if a third party in this case the internet access provider of that person has the additional information necessary for his identification. According to the said provision personal data means any information relating to an identified or identifiable natural person data subject. Pursuant to this provision an identifiable person is a person who can be identified directly or indirectly in particular by reference to an identification number or to one or more specific elements of his physical physiological.
psychological economic cultural identity or social. By Country Email List way of introduction it must be pointed out that in paragraph of the Judgment of November Scarlet Extended C EUC which concerned among other things the interpretation of the same directive the Court considered in essentially that the IP addresses of Internet users represent protected personal data as they allow the precise identification of these users. However this statement by the Court referred to the assumption that the collection and identification of Internet users IP addresses would be carried out by Internet access providers. Or in this case the first question concerns the hypothesis in which the provider of electronic communications services namely the Federal.
Republic of Germany is the one that registers the IP addresses of the users of a website that this service provider makes available to the public without ordering of the additional information necessary to identify those users. In addition it is clear that the IP addresses referred to by the referring court are dynamic IP addresses that is temporary addresses that are assigned to each connection to the Internet and are replaced on subsequent connections and not allow permanent identification of the device connected to the network. The first question addressed by the referring court is thus based on the premise that on the one hand the data consisting of a dynamic IP address as well as the.
psychological economic cultural identity or social. By Country Email List way of introduction it must be pointed out that in paragraph of the Judgment of November Scarlet Extended C EUC which concerned among other things the interpretation of the same directive the Court considered in essentially that the IP addresses of Internet users represent protected personal data as they allow the precise identification of these users. However this statement by the Court referred to the assumption that the collection and identification of Internet users IP addresses would be carried out by Internet access providers. Or in this case the first question concerns the hypothesis in which the provider of electronic communications services namely the Federal.
Republic of Germany is the one that registers the IP addresses of the users of a website that this service provider makes available to the public without ordering of the additional information necessary to identify those users. In addition it is clear that the IP addresses referred to by the referring court are dynamic IP addresses that is temporary addresses that are assigned to each connection to the Internet and are replaced on subsequent connections and not allow permanent identification of the device connected to the network. The first question addressed by the referring court is thus based on the premise that on the one hand the data consisting of a dynamic IP address as well as the.